Problems in Mainstream Science

Particle Physics
Severity high
Mind Blown Many critical thinkers believe that most of particle physics should be thrown out, others propose new models to greatly simplify it.

One physicist has left particle physics in protest and wrote a book about it. Another physicist is arguing that all of particle physics should be thrown out since 1930 on. And both of these physicists come from the land of Einstein: Germany. Even though everything we read in mainstream media seems to show “incredible” progress in particle physics, the emperors of our particle accelerators and holders of Nobel Prizes, may in fact be unclothed and wearing false trinkets.

According to physicist Dr. Alexander Unzicker and many others who are critical thinkers, most all of particle physics should be thrown out. Still others, thinks the underlying mechanisms must be changed and replaced with simpler systems. And still others are trying to unify the universes forces, improving on the standard model.

Regardless of what the science evangelists say, the vast majority of the critical thinkers outside of Big Physics are not happy campers when it comes to today’s particle physics.

Throw It Out

Particle physics and the standard model are in no.way universally accepted by scientists and even physicists.

One such physicist is Dr. Alexander Unzicker who suggests that all of particle physics should be thrown out all the way back to 1930. This means that quarks, gluons, w and z particles, the neutrino, and yes, the “god particle” the Higgs Boson would be relegated to the trash bin. This is a big claim given that billions of dollars have been spent in particle physics to supposedly “discover” these particles.

In his book “The Higgs Fake”, Dr. Unzicker describes his thesis that the way in which theoretical particle physicists go about “finding” new particles, is wrought with errors, bad assumptions, and group think that cloud the very foundation of what makes up the “Standard Model”.


There are some critical thinkers that accept a lot of the “discovered” or “predicted” by particle physics and they provide an alternative model, almost always simpler than the standard model.

One such model is the Energy Wave Theory (EWT) by critical thinker Jeff Yee. Whereas the standard model has 19 or more “variables” in their system, Jeff Yee has a new model that only needs four. What does this mean? It means that Jeff with his EWT can explain 15 variables or constants all with four. Simpler system wins.

How does he do this? He does it by what many critical thinkers do outside of Big Science: propose a completely new model to describe current theory.

Other models like the Particle Model by de Hilster and de Hilster need no free variables and construct the entire universe from moving mass and can explain charge, light, gravity, magnetic fields, atomic structure, etc. without the need for constants. The claim that all constants are invented to create useful calculations in real-world engineering.


Still others are trying to unify the supposed four forces of nature like Dr. Bill Lucas. Dr. Lucas is saying now, that the standard model is now saying there are only 3 forces to unify in the Standard Model. There is gravity (the week force), the strong interaction (this keeps the nucleous of atoms together), the electromagnetic force (magnets and electrical charge), and the weak interacting force (subatomic particles and radio activity).

Dr. Lucas’ new force equations unify these forces and remedy many of the problems presented with the standard model including explaining quite a lot of phenomena that Big Science cannot, or explaining it to a much greater level of precision.

by David de Hilster
It is probably the most sought after prize in physics. Einstein wanted it, everyone talks about it, and dissidents claim to have solved it. What is it? The unification of the four forces in nature. The latest in this quest for the "grand unification" has been quantum gravity or the unified field theory where physicists are trying to unify Einstein's general relativity with the strong force inside the atom. So far, there has been little success with many candidate theories not passing the grade and having been debunked by the experiments during the last 10 years of the Large Hadron Collider. >>>think critically...
by David de Hilster
Light just may be the most important phenomena in the universe to life. It transmits information about the physical world around us and has fascinated we humans for thousands of years. But the biggest question about light still remains: what is it really? Mainstream science tells us that it is photon. Yet if you look at conventional descriptions, one quickly learns that the definition seems still very unclear. >>>think critically...
by Jeff Yee
Although we owe respect to the pioneers of physics, including Coulomb, Newton, Ampere, Tesla and more, one of the issues that causes a separation of the electrical domain and mechanical domain of physics is that these physicists were honored by using their names for the units of matter and electromagnetic properties. By having a system with numerous units, the average student is not inclined to dive into the details of the true meaning of each property. >>>think critically...
by David de Hilster
In 1940, in a physics class in Argentina, a simple question from a physics student to his professor became a moment of "eureka" that was to take this physics student on a journey of decades challenging Albert Einstein himself. Einstein was 60 years old at the time and already hailed as a genius but this student was to change everything with a simple insight that seemed very innocent at the time.>>>think critically...
by David de Hilster
With all the triumphs that Big Physics trumpets from their cathedral of the Large Hadron Collider, it is noteworthy news when one of their high priests or in this case priestesses leaves abdicates their lofty position and then goes onto reveal why the left. And it isn't a positive story.

>>>think critically...
by David de Hilster
You will be shocked to find out that the majority of physicists do not in fact support the musings of the theoretical physicists who play with very large and expensive equipment. >>>think critically...
by Harry Ricker
Particle Fever is a science documentary film that unmasks the deception behind modern particle physics in the course of making a documentary about the Large Hadron Collider or LHC and the claimed discovery of the Higgs Boson.  The film takes us into the world of particle physics, its people, its machines and its human self deceptions, in a way never see... >>>think critically...
by Ray Gallucci
When looking at the distribution of galaxies, their distribution does not match a universe in expansion >>>think critically...

Technical Papers & Abstracts (Count: 23)

Books (Count: 33)