Problems in Mainstream Science
One physicist has left particle physics in protest and wrote a book about it. Another physicist is arguing that all of particle physics should be thrown out since 1930 on. And both of these physicists come from the land of Einstein: Germany. Even though everything we read in mainstream media seems to show “incredible” progress in particle physics, the emperors of our particle accelerators and holders of Nobel Prizes, may in fact be unclothed and wearing false trinkets.
According to physicist Dr. Alexander Unzicker and many others who are critical thinkers, most all of particle physics should be thrown out. Still others, thinks the underlying mechanisms must be changed and replaced with simpler systems. And still others are trying to unify the universes forces, improving on the standard model.
Regardless of what the science evangelists say, the vast majority of the critical thinkers outside of Big Physics are not happy campers when it comes to today’s particle physics.
Throw It Out
Particle physics and the standard model are in no.way universally accepted by scientists and even physicists.
One such physicist is Dr. Alexander Unzicker who suggests that all of particle physics should be thrown out all the way back to 1930. This means that quarks, gluons, w and z particles, the neutrino, and yes, the “god particle” the Higgs Boson would be relegated to the trash bin. This is a big claim given that billions of dollars have been spent in particle physics to supposedly “discover” these particles.
In his book “The Higgs Fake”, Dr. Unzicker describes his thesis that the way in which theoretical particle physicists go about “finding” new particles, is wrought with errors, bad assumptions, and group think that cloud the very foundation of what makes up the “Standard Model”.
There are some critical thinkers that accept a lot of the “discovered” or “predicted” by particle physics and they provide an alternative model, almost always simpler than the standard model.
One such model is the Energy Wave Theory (EWT) by critical thinker Jeff Yee. Whereas the standard model has 19 or more “variables” in their system, Jeff Yee has a new model that only needs four. What does this mean? It means that Jeff with his EWT can explain 15 variables or constants all with four. Simpler system wins.
How does he do this? He does it by what many critical thinkers do outside of Big Science: propose a completely new model to describe current theory.
Other models like the Particle Model by de Hilster and de Hilster need no free variables and construct the entire universe from moving mass and can explain charge, light, gravity, magnetic fields, atomic structure, etc. without the need for constants. The claim that all constants are invented to create useful calculations in real-world engineering.
Still others are trying to unify the supposed four forces of nature like Dr. Bill Lucas. Dr. Lucas is saying now, that the standard model is now saying there are only 3 forces to unify in the Standard Model. There is gravity (the week force), the strong interaction (this keeps the nucleous of atoms together), the electromagnetic force (magnets and electrical charge), and the weak interacting force (subatomic particles and radio activity).
Dr. Lucas’ new force equations unify these forces and remedy many of the problems presented with the standard model including explaining quite a lot of phenomena that Big Science cannot, or explaining it to a much greater level of precision.