Problems in Mainstream Science

Black Holes
Severity high
Mind Blown Black holes as described by Big Science are very problematic

It is a fact that there are very dense objects in the universe. There is one in the center of our galaxy that makes stars orbit around it. We can’t see black holes because they supposedly have such great gravity, that not even light escapes.

What is in dispute is exactly what these objects are. Big Science talks about black holes in very mathematical terms and has over the years, created many problems with their “theoretical models”. The critical thinkers today outside of Big Science agree there are very dense objects in the universe, but they are not black, and they are not holes.

Even Stephen Hawking, considered one of the foremost experts on the theory of black holes, admitted that after 30 years of working on the theory of black holes, that he was wrong about their nature:

Yet, it is another Stephen that is really shaking things up. His name is Stephen Crothers. And this Stephen was so threatening to the black hole community he was thrown out of the university in Australia for wanting to challenge the mathematics of black holes.

Most critical thinkers outside of Big Science agree that black holes are very dense, but the current model is greatly flawed including – and that includes others who are not named “Steve”.

by David de Hilster
The hype for the latest "great scientific achievement" follows other recent "great scientific achievements" such as the detection of "gravity waves" and the confirmation of the Higgs Boson known as the "god particle". These announcements are usually publicized weeks in advance in order to create maximum hype and peek interest in what quickly becomes irrelevant to society as a whole. >>>think critically...
by Harry Ricker
The BBC Horizon program, Supermassive Black Holes, is an example of how science documentaries have turned science into science fiction, by combining a little science fact with fictional writing to produce speculative science fiction. Unfortunately, much of modern mainstream science is infected with this type of speculative fiction. We can lay the blame for this on the modern scientific method, whi... >>>think critically...
by Glenn Borchardt
Now to the question at hand: Does the black hole in M87 falsify the Big Bang Theory? According to the Big Bang Theory, the universe exploded out of nothing 13.8 billion years ago. Since then, matter has been accumulating in the form of about 2 trillion galaxies, with the youngest being spiralic and oldest being elliptical. >>>think critically...
by Stephen Crothers
This is how astronomers and cosmologists do science: fraud by means of mass-media induced mass-hysteria. It beggars belief. Think about it: according to the astronomers and cosmologists the finite mass of their black hole is concentrated in a 'physical singularity' of zero volume, infinite density, and infinite gravity. But no finite mass has zero volume, infinite density, and infinite gravity, anywhere! >>>think critically...
by Lori Gardi
The first Eureka moment for me was in 1985 when Scientific American published, for the first time, the algorithm for the Mandelbrot Set. It was in the Computer Recreations section of the magazine, written by Kee Dewdney at the time.  >>>think critically...
by Stephen Crothers
Australian Stephen Crothers declared war on black holes a while back. Since then, he has been on the crusade to set things straight about these mysterious objects in the heavens. >>>think critically...
by Stephen Crothers
In about March 2003 I formally commenced part-time candidature for the PhD in the School of Physics at the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia, under the supervision of Professor John K. Webb. The support supervisor was Professor Michael Ashley. I was initially engaged in the development of a computer simulation program in relation to Extra-Solar Planets.

>>>think critically...

Technical Papers & Abstracts (Count: 44)